I'm Pearl Oguchi. I come in when your product is live, users are signing up but not coming back, growth has started to flatten, and everyone has a different theory about why. I find the real product–user gaps behind weak activation and retention, and stay with you until the first critical fixes are shipped. With 22 shipping software either at scale or to a small number of users, including 9 at Meta, I understand how products should behave and what good looks like.
“Pearl spots the gaps that those of us deep inside the product simply cannot see.”
Founder, Kin.
"You can have a good team, real investment, and a product that still is not doing what it needs to do. Users drop off. Metrics flatten. The roadmap keeps moving, but confidence does not. Everyone close to the build has an explanation for the churn and activation issues, but nobody is naming the real product–user gap plainly enough to take to a board or investor."
That's the gap I sit in. I work with founders who have invested real money and real time into a product that is live, bringing in sign‑ups, but quietly leaking users and flattening on growth. They need someone with no stake in the existing decisions to tell them what is actually happening between the product and its users, and what to fix before more runway is burned.
My read on that gap is not theoretical. It comes from 22 years building and shipping technology, including 9 years at Meta London, working across engineering, product, and delivery under real pressure, where what holds and what breaks shows up fast.
It also comes from what I have chosen to build and stand for outside the job: founding Black Women in Tech, now a 52,000‑strong community; representing technology companies in policy discussions with government and regulators through ACT; serving as an elected councillor; and living with rheumatoid arthritis. All of it sharpened the same instinct: when something is not right, you do not look away. You go towards it.
Qube Catalyst exists to give you an independent voice with no stake in the outcome except the right one – especially when your product is live, users are not sticking, and nobody inside the room can name the real gap plainly.
When your software is live but users are leaving, there is a hidden reason. I use my P.E.A.R.L. framework: Product, Engagement, Activation, Retention, Leverage - to hunt down those flaws. Then I stay with you until the right things are fixed and early retention starts to move. Here are the three ways we can use this framework to fix your app, based on how deep you need to go:
I focus on one thing: how a new user moves from landing on your site to using the main value in your product for the first time. If that path is confusing, slow, or breaks trust, you lose users and money before you even launch or raise.
Most teams are too close to their own product to judge it clearly. Founders, developers, and agency partners all have a stake in the outcome, which makes it harder to spot where the product is underperforming, where trust is being lost, or where users quietly drop away after the first few uses. This review is designed for that moment – when the product is live, the numbers are flattening, and you need clarity fast before more time and money go into the wrong area. Or perhaps you are preparing for a funding round and need a clear, evidence-backed story about your product’s health.
Diagnosis turned into a deeper data story. Over one blackout week, we move from “something is wrong” to a clear, evidence‑based picture of how users behave and where retention really breaks.
Teams rarely fail because they saw nothing. They fail because data is messy, the wrong numbers get attention, or early churn is treated as a mystery. The Telemetry Deep‑Dive is for the moment when the product is live, cohorts are starting to slip, and you need a clean view of what your numbers are actually saying before a funding round or board review.
A full product, data, and roadmap alignment cycle that shows where the product is most likely to fail in real use, what it is costing the business, and how to focus your team on the changes that move retention and growth.
Products at scale rarely struggle because nobody noticed the issues. They struggle because different teams have different stories, marketing promises one thing while the product does another, and engineering sprints keep going without a shared view of the real risks. The Ecosystem Alignment Programme is built for funded teams and scale‑ups who need an independent, end‑to‑end view before committing to big technical or strategic moves.
An ongoing safety layer that checks the impact of changes over time, so fixes do not quietly create new problems and your numbers stay honest as you grow.
Once teams start changing flows and tracking, it is easy to fix one leak and create another. The Oversight Guard keeps a steady, independent eye on your critical paths and telemetry, and helps your team keep sprints focused on real product‑user risks rather than just new features.
The vision To enable a world where software and technology are built not just to function, but to serve
The mission is simple: By 2030, Qube Catalyst will empower 10,000 technology builders, founders, and organisations across at least three countries to build software that is safe, ethical, and genuinely beneficial, through direct oversight, education, partnerships, and a global movement that makes independent quality the standard, not the exception.
When that mission meets real products, it shows up first in how people behave after sign‑up – in activation, repeat use, and whether users quietly slip away. That is why the work starts with diagnosing the product–user gap behind weak activation and retention, even though the ambition is much broader than one metric.
Earlier is preventative. Problems get named before they become expensive. Later is reactive. The stakes are higher and the damage is closer – this is where leaking users, weak activation, and stalled growth show up. There is no wrong time to bring me in. Only a cost to waiting.
I don’t want you paying for theatre if there isn’t real product–user risk to address.
Every PEARL diagnostic starts with a clear look at how your live product behaves; if that work shows there’s no meaningful structural gap to fix, I stop rather than stretching the engagement, and we either close it out or reshape it around a more honest question.
"Pearl spots the gaps that those of us deep inside a SaaS product simply cannot see. She looked at the product over lunch and spotted a design flaw in 8 seconds. And she was completely right. Then she spotted a second. We stopped there and scheduled her to speak with the team. As we bring on early customers, design partnerships are everything. Brilliant, experienced, honest voices like Pearl's are how we make sure we hit that mark. If you're looking for someone to help coach you through those product gaps, she's your person."
I brought Pearl in at short notice to support the build for my trades app. She delivered exactly what we needed: a fast, focused review that flagged critical issues and gave my developer clear, actionable fixes ahead of user testing. Her approach was professional, efficient and incredibly helpful. Thanks to Pearl's input, we went into testing with confidence and clarity. I highly recommend ...
You told me the truth about things I needed to hear, and that kind of boldness is rare. Building FieldNote has required me to get uncomfortable every single day. Grateful to have connected with someone who understands exactly why that is necessary.
Qube Catalyst was an exceptional partner throughout the development and launch of the Reel Time Fishing Tournament mobile applications for both iOS and Android... and they exceeded expectations in every area. Pearl's contributions played a major role in helping us deliver a stable, polished, and user-friendly experience across both platforms.
Working with Pearl on a recent web application review was exceptional. Her precision, professionalism, and ability to spot issues that others miss made a huge difference. Pearl identified improvements, highlighted strengths, and delivered feedback that was both constructive and immediately actionable.
Start with the P.E.A.R.L. Launch Insurance; an early trust check on the product–user gap, delivered in 1 few day.